Applying the fundamentals of change to real life…
Posted on Oct 7th, 2008
by
dannyboy
Since completing the posting of the Everything Changes! series I've been thinking about what to do next. What came to mind fairly quickly was applying the principals from this series to real changes. One of the things I had hoped for in writing the course was that people might take the fundamentals and see if they could spot them at work in their direct experience. However, I would be the first to acknowledge that some of the concepts are so closely aligned with our being that they're very difficult to detect.
One small example is the title of the series…Everything Changes! On one level of consciousness we know that things change. But frequently it's far more comfortable to think that things don't change. People don't change, government and politicians don't change, life itself doesn't change. Heck, some of us don't even want to acknowledge climate change…or at least that there is man-made involvement in climate change. But this is just another example of being more comfortable with the belief that things don't change.
From our discussion of change we know that actions create change. But we don't perceive the change in every action because many of our actions are aimed at keeping things the same. In recent weeks our attention has been riveted to the financial crisis unfolding on Wall Street. Here looms a change and a challenge to our financial system that hasn't been seen since the Great Depression.
Q: What was the government's response to this seemingly overnight financial crisis?
The immediate response was to prevent a massive financial collapse. Aside from whether we think an unprecedented $700 Billion dollar bailout with taxpayer's money was warranted, the point I want to make is it represents an attempt to keep things the same--to prevent this change from mushrooming into even greater change. Is that a bad thing? No, I think it's far better than doing nothing. However, it was interesting that as soon as the bailout got approved we had many financial pundits claiming the bailout wouldn't improve the markets anytime soon. And indeed the crisis seems to be expanding to a global credit crunch, with various European governments now scrambling to shore up failing banks in their countries. And the realization that the bailout will take time to work has resulted in further declines in stock values on Wall Street.
Q: Ok, this much we all know; but how can we utilize the fundamentals of change to understand how this all impacts us?
Remember how we talked about events that create a perceived unknown that in turn creates a sense of discomfort because we don't know how things are going to turn out? This chain of events is the reason we resist change. It's also the reason we take action to keep things unchanged. We said these circumstances are intertwined with our need for control--with our need to feel as though we're in control of our environment.
When we talked about the need for control I acknowledged that it's such a seamless part of us that we often don't even recognize it until an event arises that threatens our sense of control. These are the perceived changes that instinctively produce a reaction of discomfort from our internal operating system. Every human being strives to establish a sense of control as a base from which to live and be. We're not talking about "control freaks," we're talking about a fundamental need in everyone that can be translated into an internal sense of well-being. Only in experiencing change are we shown a glimpse of this internal need.
Q: So how does our need for control become a factor in this financial crisis?
First we need to recognize that a Free Enterprise system is centered and focused on money. Everything costs money from meeting basic needs for food, clothing and shelter to whatever else you can imagine. Everything has a price and money is the means to acquiring it. Under this scenario it's only natural that money becomes associated with control. If you've got money you establish a measure of control over your environment. When change does happen, money can insulate you from any problems that arise.
In this case it's the loss of money that erodes our sense of control. Whether the loss comes in the form of declining home values or declines in the value of your 401K, the security blanket represented by the amount of money we have has lost some of its coverage. As a result we feel as though we have less control over our circumstances. The loss of control is even worse for a family facing the loss of their home through foreclosure. Or for a small business depending on a line of credit to fund inventories, pay suppliers and make payroll. If short-term credit is unavailable to meet these needs we face a domino effect in terms of further declines in economic activity, jobs and ultimately the ability to continue repaying our personal debt.
Q: Are there other ways we might look at this situation?
I believe there are and we'll look at a couple of those ways next time…
Note to reader: Thanks for reading! As always, I welcome any thoughts, comments or input you might have on change or as it pertains to the subject of this blog.
One small example is the title of the series…Everything Changes! On one level of consciousness we know that things change. But frequently it's far more comfortable to think that things don't change. People don't change, government and politicians don't change, life itself doesn't change. Heck, some of us don't even want to acknowledge climate change…or at least that there is man-made involvement in climate change. But this is just another example of being more comfortable with the belief that things don't change.
From our discussion of change we know that actions create change. But we don't perceive the change in every action because many of our actions are aimed at keeping things the same. In recent weeks our attention has been riveted to the financial crisis unfolding on Wall Street. Here looms a change and a challenge to our financial system that hasn't been seen since the Great Depression.
Q: What was the government's response to this seemingly overnight financial crisis?
The immediate response was to prevent a massive financial collapse. Aside from whether we think an unprecedented $700 Billion dollar bailout with taxpayer's money was warranted, the point I want to make is it represents an attempt to keep things the same--to prevent this change from mushrooming into even greater change. Is that a bad thing? No, I think it's far better than doing nothing. However, it was interesting that as soon as the bailout got approved we had many financial pundits claiming the bailout wouldn't improve the markets anytime soon. And indeed the crisis seems to be expanding to a global credit crunch, with various European governments now scrambling to shore up failing banks in their countries. And the realization that the bailout will take time to work has resulted in further declines in stock values on Wall Street.
Q: Ok, this much we all know; but how can we utilize the fundamentals of change to understand how this all impacts us?
Remember how we talked about events that create a perceived unknown that in turn creates a sense of discomfort because we don't know how things are going to turn out? This chain of events is the reason we resist change. It's also the reason we take action to keep things unchanged. We said these circumstances are intertwined with our need for control--with our need to feel as though we're in control of our environment.
When we talked about the need for control I acknowledged that it's such a seamless part of us that we often don't even recognize it until an event arises that threatens our sense of control. These are the perceived changes that instinctively produce a reaction of discomfort from our internal operating system. Every human being strives to establish a sense of control as a base from which to live and be. We're not talking about "control freaks," we're talking about a fundamental need in everyone that can be translated into an internal sense of well-being. Only in experiencing change are we shown a glimpse of this internal need.
Q: So how does our need for control become a factor in this financial crisis?
First we need to recognize that a Free Enterprise system is centered and focused on money. Everything costs money from meeting basic needs for food, clothing and shelter to whatever else you can imagine. Everything has a price and money is the means to acquiring it. Under this scenario it's only natural that money becomes associated with control. If you've got money you establish a measure of control over your environment. When change does happen, money can insulate you from any problems that arise.
In this case it's the loss of money that erodes our sense of control. Whether the loss comes in the form of declining home values or declines in the value of your 401K, the security blanket represented by the amount of money we have has lost some of its coverage. As a result we feel as though we have less control over our circumstances. The loss of control is even worse for a family facing the loss of their home through foreclosure. Or for a small business depending on a line of credit to fund inventories, pay suppliers and make payroll. If short-term credit is unavailable to meet these needs we face a domino effect in terms of further declines in economic activity, jobs and ultimately the ability to continue repaying our personal debt.
Q: Are there other ways we might look at this situation?
I believe there are and we'll look at a couple of those ways next time…
Note to reader: Thanks for reading! As always, I welcome any thoughts, comments or input you might have on change or as it pertains to the subject of this blog.

Help



